All You Wanted to Know about the BHBC Music Ministry (and more)

Archive for June, 2017

MUSIC NOTES: 6.27.17



NOTICE:  No small-group Bible Study; ONE COMBINED WORSHIP SERVICE at 10:30am; Adult Choir, please meet me in the choir room at 10am where we will polish up Wilhousky’s “Battle Hymn.”   AND…. this is the last Sunday we will sing until we resume Wed. evening activities/rehearsals in late August.

Choir:  Battle Hymn

Preacher:  Jason


Is Genesis history? One of my friends from the apologetics program at HBU replied, “Yes – ever since Phil Collins went solo.” LOL (I agree!)

I recently watched a program on Netflix titled, “Is Genesis history?”

Interviewed are scientists with Ph.D’s in geology, paleontology, biology, microbiology, marine biology, astronomy, and archaeology. (The interview that blew my mind most was with the marine biologist.)

One of the scientists interviewed, Arthur Chadwick, has a Ph.D in Taphonomy – the branch of paleontology that deals with the processes of fossilization. He said:

“It’s one thing to have faith – I have faith that God was the creator. That’s substantiated by [the evidence] I see around me. To say I have faith that evolution produced [dinosaur fossils] – I can’t even see how it could have happened. That’s *blind* faith.”

The show includes a significant amount of discussion regarding the age of the earth i.e. “young earth” (6 to 10,0000 years old) vs “old earth” (hundreds of millions of years old). This is a non-essential for the Christian faith. It makes for intriguing dialogue but it’s not critical what one’s belief is where the age of the earth is concerned.

Oxford professor of mathematics, Dr. John Lennox, wisely writes,

“It is important to take on board right away that both the young-earth and the ancient-earth creationist views go back a long way. Neither of them is a recent invention.”

While some hold to a hard-line position that the word translated “day” (Hebrew “יוֹם” or “yom”) recorded in the creation narrative is, without question, a 24-hour day (in my opinion, the Hebrew word “yom”, when interpreted systematically, does, in fact, suggest a 24-hour period of time), there are multiple committed Christian scientists – and theologians – who hold to an “old earth” position or, at least, are open to the idea. Bottom line: it doesn’t matter. (What matters is that Christ died on the cross outside Jerusalem 20 centuries ago and rose from the grave three days later.)

Whatever the age of the earth, it is interesting to know that biblical scholars cite that more time transpires in the first 11 chapters of Genesis than in the rest of the Bible combined.

Of course, as a professing Christian, I personally believe Genesis to be narrative history. What was powerful (to me) in the 90 minute show was the intelligence of the dialogue. Very compelling. Again, Christianity certainly requires faith – but it’s not blind faith.

NOTE: I mentioned Dr. Lennox. For further study on this topic, I would recommend his fine book, “Seven Days That Divide the World: The Beginning According to Genesis and Science.”

Hats off to Netflix for making the program available.  You can read a small blurb about the show here.  (You must be a subscriber to Netflix to be able to view this show at this time.)



Powerful story.

I share these stories to, hopefully, remind people that, certainly, Christianity requires faith, but it’s an intelligent faith.

Paul, the disciples, Luke, Mark, Cornelius, the Philippian jailer, the Greek philosophers at Mars Hill, Apollos & Aquilla, etc., (people recorded in the New Testament who placed their faith in Christ) were not simple-minded, gullible, backwoods morons. These were intelligent, critically-thinking people who made a deliberate choice to trust that Christ was exactly who he said he was – much like Dr. Greg Viehman here.

Access Dr. Viehmann’s story here (A video testimony follows the article.)



Read the crazy story here.



I grew up working my summers on my grandparents’ farm.  I know these to be t

Your fences need to be horse-high, pig-tight and bull-strong.

Life is simpler when you plow around the stump.

A bumble-bee is considerably faster than a John Deere tractor.

Do not corner something you know is meaner than you.

When you wallow with the pigs, expect to get dirty.

Always drink upstream from the herd.

Don’t pick a fight with an old man. If he’s too old to fight, he’ll just kill you. 🙂


QUOTE(s) of the WEEK

The late British evangelist Gypsy Smith once quipped, “There are five Gospels: Matthew, Mark, Luke, John and the Christian, but most people never read the first four.”



During a visit to the doctor, a patient asked him, “How do you determine whether or not an older person should be put in a old-age home?”

“Well,” he said, “we fill up a bathtub, then we offer a teaspoon, a teacup and a bucket to the person to empty the bathtub.”

“Oh, I understand,” the patient said.  “A normal person would use the bucket to empty the bathtub because it is bigger than the spoon or teacup.”

“No,” he said.  “A normal person would pull the plug.  Do you want a bed near the window?”


GRACE NOTES:  Pascal’s Wager

Blaise Pascal (pronounced “pas-KAL”) was a 17th century French philosopher, mathematician, scientist and inventor.  He was also a Christian who is famous for what is commonly known as Pascal’s Wager.  This article was published in the regional magazine, Lubbock Metro Leader.  View the blog here.


Soli Deo Gloria, Nick


MUSIC NOTES: 6.20.17

NOTE:  I leave to go to a conference on Sunday afternoon, June 18th.  So I’m getting this week’s Music Notes to you a few days early. :))


SUNDAY, June 25th

Choir:  “Standing on the Solid Rock Medley” (sorry for the confusion; I’ve changed the song schedule a little.  We will sing this song on the 25th)

Preacher:  Jim Gerlt


REMINDER:  Monday, June 19th – Staff & volunteers will begin clearing the FLC kitchen for demolition and construction.


FINAL NOTICE BEFORE EVENT:  You can access all the information (and needed help) for this event by clicking hereThe event is this coming Friday, June 23rd.  Staff liaison is Mike Lewis (since I will be out of town.)  Questions?  Contact Mike.


I recently met with Pastor Jason about our Bacon Heights web site.  As we visited, one of the tasks he invited me to oversee is a web page dedicated to the hard questions of the Christian faith.  (This is a passion of mine and a field of graduate study I have enjoyed.)  I simply wanted to alert you to the fact that I have begun work on that web page.  You can view the link here.  The site is in its embryonic stages as I have only just begun working on it.  In the coming weeks and months, I will work to improve and broaden the design, resources and information.  But, even now, I have provided quotes and web links to helpful sites and resources.  Enjoy learning why you believe what you believe.  Incidentally, I’ve also updated our Music Ministry web page.  You can check that out here.



What follows is an excellent, systematic response to that question by Lee Strobel.  Enjoy.

Amos makes it clear that he was minding his business, shepherding livestock and caring for sycamore trees, when God called him as a prophet. Just as his calling was divinely inspired, so too is the record of his life. The Bible says that “all Scripture is God-breathed” (2 Timothy 3:16). So what do Christians believe was the process by which God created the Bible?

Dr. Daniel B. Wallace, one of the foremost scholars of New Testament Greek, fields this question by saying, “We aren’t given a lot regarding the process of inspiration, but we know the Bible wasn’t dictated by God. Look at the Old Testament: Isaiah has a huge vocabulary and is often considered the Shakespeare of the Hebrew prophets, while Amos was a simple farmer with a much more modest vocabulary. Yet both books were inspired. Obviously, this doesn’t mean verbal dictation. God wasn’t looking for stenographers but holy men to write his book.”

Some clues about the inspiration of Scripture are apparent when Matthew quotes the Old Testament, saying, “This was spoken by the Lord through the prophet” (Matthew 2:15, author’s paraphrase). “By the Lord” suggests God is the ultimate agent of that prophecy. “Through the prophet” suggests an intermediate agent who also uses his personality. That means the prophet was not taking dictation from God; instead, God was communicating through visions, dreams and so forth, and the prophet was putting it in his own words.

When Christians say the Bible is inspired, they mean it is both the Word of God and the words of men. Founder of Dallas Theological Seminary, Lewis Sperry Chafer, puts it well: “Without violating the authors’ personalities, they wrote with their own feelings, literary abilities, and concerns. But in the end, God could say, That’s exactly what I wanted to have written.”

Dr. Wallace says, “Remarkably, the New Testament writers didn’t even know they were writing Scripture, so obviously God’s work was behind the scenes. In the end, I think this is a greater miracle than a Bible coming down from heaven on golden tablets, because the books of the Bible are a collective product that men embraced as their own while ultimately — and often only much later — recognizing that there was another author behind the scenes. It wasn’t until one of the final books of the New Testament was written that Peter uses the word Scripture in referring to Paul’s letters” (see 2 Peter 3:16).


QUOTE(s) of the WEEK

“If we submit everything to reason our religion will be left with nothing mysterious or supernatural. If we offend the principles of reason our religion will be absurd and ridiculous . . . There are two equally dangerous extremes: to exclude reason; to admit nothing but reason.” ― Blaise Pascal, 17th century mathematician & physicist

“We may be, in part, products of our past: but if the gospel is true, we do not need to be prisoners of it.” Andy Bannister




GRACE NOTES:  “Who is Jesus?”

It’s the most important answer you’ll ever give.  Read the blog here.


Soli Deo Gloria, Nick

MUSIC NOTES: 6.13.17


THIS SUNDAY, June 18th (Father’s Day)

Choir:  I Stand Upon the Rock Medley

Preacher:  Jason

Note: Join me at 8:45am in the Choir Room during the month of June. 


THIS PAST WEEK’S BIG STORY:  Freedom of Religion? Yes.  Freedom of Biblical Christianity?  Not so much.

As I’ve stated before, I do not address politics in this publication.  We all have our convictions and opinions where politics is concerned.  (If you ever want to know mine – again, as I’ve stated before – call me for coffee and I’ll be happy to share. :))

Having said that, the issue of religious freedom is a bipartisan issue clearly supported by the United States Constitution – and I have no reluctance for speaking to, or defending, that freedom.

The big news last week was the attack on religious freedom by two U.S. Senators.  The person under religious attack was Russell Vought, President Trump’s nominee for deputy director of the White House Office of Management and Budget.

Russell Vought is an alumni of Wheaton College, a strongly evangelical Christian school.  Approximately a year and a half ago, a Wheaton professor, Dr. Larycia Hawkins stated that Muslims and Christians worship the same God – which is, according to the message of the Bible vs. the message of the Q’uaran, blatantly false. (For a brief explanation of the exclusivity of the world’s major religions click here.) While still a professor at Wheaton, Hawkins had written, “I stand in religious solidarity with Muslims because they, like me, a Christian, are people of the book.  And as Pope Francis stated last week, we worship the same God.”

Wheaton College terminated Dr. Hawkins. As you can imagine, a firestorm of debate ensued.  One of the editorials written in the weeks that followed Dr. Hawkins’ termination was one by Mr. Vought  explaining the discrepancy between Islamic and Biblical theology.  You can read that editorial here.

At Mr. Vought’s confirmation hearing last week, two Senators – Bernie Sanders & Christopher Van Hollen Jr. – asked probing questions about Mr. Vought’s Christian faith.  But they didn’t stop there.  What followed was an overt attack on Mr. Vought’s Christian faith and how, in the senators’ opinion, Mr. Vought’s faith makes him unqualified to serve in public office.   The attack on Vought’s Christian faith was done under the guise that his Christian faith might impede his ability to treat people fairly.  You can view the the exchange between Sanders & Vought below.  It’s less than 3 minutes in length.

Clearly, Senator Sanders’ implication is that one’s faith should be a litmus test to serve in public office.  This is where the real firestorm exploded.  Of course, Sanders defiantly defended his comments by saying, “In my view, the statement made by Mr. Vought is indefensible, it is hateful, it is Islamophobic, and it is an insult to over a billion Muslims throughout the world.”  So, here Mr. Sanders makes one of his many mistakes:  he defends one of the world’s religions (Islam) and attacks another (Christianity).  It is significant to understand that, both, Islam and Christianity make exclusive claims for truth.  But, alas, only Christianity gets attacked.

And, speaking of Christianity, Senator Christopher Van Hollen Jr., offered this convoluting comment.  Speaking to Mr. Vought, he says,

“I think it is irrefutable that these kinds of comments suggest to a whole lot of Americans that, number one . . . you are condemning people of all faiths. I’m a Christian, but part of being a Christian in my view is recognizing that there are lots of ways that people can pursue their God. . . .

I’m happy the senator said, “…in my view…”  Because, clearly, the Senator is sorely unfamiliar with his Bible.  He is justified in saying that “there are lots of ways that people can pursue their God.”  No one disagrees with that.  However, there’s only one way to know the God of the Bible: through faith in his son, Jesus Christ.

To no one’s surprise, the Huffington Post defended Sanders’ statements, creating their own version of logic.  The author, James Zogby, wrote:

It is Vought, not Sanders who has used a religious test to support the firing of a tenured professor. His demonstrated intolerance is a disturbing trait for someone in public service. Vought may claim that all are “worthy of dignity and respect regardless of their religious beliefs”, but when it came to Professor Hawkins, a fellow Christian, Vought behaved quite differently, precisely because her description of her faith did not comport with his narrow interpretation of Christian theology.

Zogby’s logic is myopic and downright wrong.  Dr. Hawkins was teaching non-Christian doctrine at an expressly evangelical Christian college, and was not running for public office.  (I would ask Mr. Zogby to try and teach non-Islamic doctrine at an Islamic school and see what happens next.) Comparing the two stories is an argument based on Zogby’s errant logic, biased opinion and gross ignorance of the biblical gospel.

As expected, the ACLU, quickly jumped to Sanders’ defense by writing:

“Religious freedom is such a fundamental liberty that the framers of our Constitution enshrined it in the First Amendment. That’s why it’s so disturbing that Trump continues to pack his administration with appointees like Russell Vought, whose views threaten that very freedom.”

Once again, every world religion is given a pass – except Christianity.  The hypocrisy was deafening.  And the world noticed.

Russell Moore, president of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention responded to Sanders’ comments.  He said:

Senator Sanders’ comments are breathtakingly audacious and shockingly ignorant — both of the Constitution and of basic Christian doctrine. Even if one were to excuse Senator Sanders for not realizing that all Christians of every age have insisted that faith in Jesus Christ is the only pathway to salvation, it is inconceivable that Senator Sanders would cite religious beliefs as disqualifying an individual for public office in defiance of the United States Constitution. No religious test shall ever be required of those seeking public office. While no one expects Senator Sanders to be a theologian, we should expect far more from an elected official who has taken an oath to support and defend the Constitution.

Sen. James Lankford (I’ve met Senator Lankford) warned that Sanders’ comments come “dangerously close to crossing a clear constitutional line for how we evaluate qualifications for public service.”  He continued,

“The First Amendment is crystal clear that the federal government must protect every American’s right to the peaceful and free exercise of religion.  We cannot say we have the free exercise of religion and also require people to practice their faith only in a way that government officials prefer.”

Emma Green, writing for the secular publication, The Atlantic, defended Vought:

It’s one thing to take issue with bigotry. It’s another to try to exclude people from office based on their theological convictions. Sanders used the term “Islamophobia” to suggest that Vought fears Muslims for who they are. But in his writing (in his editorial for Wheaten College), Vought was contesting something different: He disagrees with what Muslims believe, and does not think their faith is satisfactory for salvation. Right or wrong, this is a conviction held by millions of Americans—and many Muslims might say the same thing about Christianity.

As you can imagine, Twitter blew up over this story.  NYT Best-Selling author, Eric Metaxas, tweeted,

“What [Sen. Sanders] did was in fact so bad, and so un-American, that we should be demanding his resignation.  It is a stunning moment in our history.”

And the conservative news site, The Federalist, disseminated all the jargon by tweeting simply, “Senator Sanders doesn’t think Christians are fit for public office.”

A friend of mine from HBU (he lives in the beautiful state of Vermont – the state Sanders represents) wrote a blog entitled, Senator Bernie Sanders and the Inverse Religious Test for Civil Service.  He writes, “Dear Senator Sanders,…

“…a worldview that affirms all other worldviews to be true is a contradiction in and of itself because it is evidently not true that all worldviews can be simultaneously true… The issue is that when you hold certain beliefs, you are espousing a particular worldview, and that worldview is inevitably at odds with other worldviews… You claim to embrace tolerance, but you are in fact being intolerant of Mr. Vought simply because of his freely chosen religious beliefs. That is hypocrisy.”

In the Washington Post, Jim Wallace wrote an editorial with the following subtitle: Democrats could stand to know more about religion.  Christians also need to express our beliefs without vitriol.  After reading Wallace’s article, I found it’s Wallace who needs to learn more about what Jesus said and did.  He would find this:  the gospel, by its very nature, is offensiveIt tells us we’re hopeless sinners in desperate need of a Savior.  And it tells us that those who die, having not professed their faith in Christ, will stand in judgment of hell You can’t proclaim the gospel of Jesus and count on everyone liking you – just ask Jesus.  They crucified him. 

Senator Sanders exposed his true motive during the hearing.  He has little interest in religious freedom – if you’re a Christian.  Additionally, he has no concept of the fundamental differences between world religions.  Finally, he is accusing Mr. Vought of making daily decisions based on his convictions when he is doing the very thing: deciding to attack Mr. Vought based on his own convictions. Religious or not, do we not all live our lives based on fundamental principles in which we strongly believe?

Let me be perfectly clear – if this story were turned around 180 degrees, and an evangelical Christian Senator had attacked the religious convictions of a political nominee representing a different religion, I would be writing the same opinion piece on behalf of the individual who was being marginalized and harassed.  If you don’t like someone’s religious faith or worldview – and they’re running for public office – don’t vote for them.  But, we must never personally attack them because of their faith or suggest they are less of a person solely because they don’t hold to the same convictions/worldview we do.

The moment we allow this to take place in government is the moment Religious Freedom will be a thing of the past.

I titled this blog “Freedom of Religion? Yes.  Freedom of Biblical Christianity?  Not so much.”  Here’s why:  (1) I use the term “biblical Christianity” because the term “Christian” is widely used and, as such, means different things to different people.  For instance, in this blog both, Dr. Hawkins and Senator Van Hollen Jr., refer to themselves as Christians while, apparently, holding to doctrines not taught in the Bible.  (2) While some might prefer to remove religious principles from any and all decisions made by those serving in public office, it is logically impossible to divorce someone’s decisions from what they believe – we’re not robots.  We all have convictions, beliefs and principles that drive our daily decisions and make us who we are.  Senator Sanders, here, defends Islamic faith, while attacking Christian faith.  If this is true (and I don’t see any other way to interpret it), then Senator Sanders – and those who defend his statements – represent those who, according to their words, believe in the freedom of religion – as long as it’s not the Christian faith.

In sum, if Senator Sanders were to read a Bible I suspect he would never have attacked Mr. Vought’s Christian faith. For, he would see in the gospels that, although Jesus clearly states he is the only way to God, he never imposed his convictions on a single person.  On the contrary, he preached the truth and left the decision to trust him solely up to the listener, even when his message resulted in many people choosing to no longer follow him.  Jesus never compromised the truth of his message (and this made him a lot of enemies), but he treated all people equally, with love and respect.

All the way to the Cross.

nick  (You can also access this editorial blog on my blog site “Soul Food” here.)



Excerpt from the Forbes article:

“Darwinists detest intelligent design theory because it is compatible with belief in God.

But the evidence is unassailable. The most reasonable scientific explanation for functional biological complexity–the genetic code and the intricate nanotechnology inside living cells–is that they were designed by intelligent agency. There is no scientific evidence that unintelligent processes can create substantial new biological structures and function. There is no unintelligent process known to science that can generate codes and machines.

I still consider religious explanations for biology to be unscientific at best, dogma at worst. But I understand now that Darwinism itself is a religious creed that masquerades as science. Darwin’s theory of biological origins is atheism’s creation myth, and atheists defend their dogma with religious fervor.” (End of excerpt)

The author, Michael Egnor, is a professor and vice chairman of the department of neurosurgery at the State University of New York at Stony Brook.  Read the very brief article here.



So, here’s what you get when you’re on the same flight as one of the traveling casts of Disney’s “Lion King”.  Enjoy…



Much help needed!  All pertinent informatioin was included in last week’s edition.  To view the information, click here.


Monday, June 19- we will begin clearing the FLC kitchen.


QUOTE(s) of the WEEK

“Jesus Christ has broken the power of Satan;….and henceforth evil spirits, instead of having power over us, tremble and are [terrified] of every true Christian.” John Henry Newman, 1801-1890

“You believe that God is one; you do well [to believe that]. The demons also believe [that], and shudder and bristle [in awe-filled terror—they have seen His wrath]!”  James 2:19 (Amplified)



As one friend wrote after I posted this on my Facebook page:  “I knew it!  Luckily, I’m safe.”


GRACE NOTES:  Hope on the Rock(s)

This past week I was looking through old files and made an alarming discovery: I stumbled upon the last devotional I had written (for this e-newsletter) prior to my son, Jordan, taking his life. The newsletter was dated 5/8/13. Jordan would die only five days later. What caused me to gasp and grip my chest was the topic of the devotional: hope in times of despair. Little did i know. I thought it was worth re-posting.  You can view it here.


Soli Deo Gloria, Nick




Choir:  I Stand Upon the Rock Medley  (Fun song!)

Preacher:  Jason

NOTE: Choir, mid-week rehearsals have now ended for the summer.  Please join me each Sunday morning at 8:45 in the choir room.



At the bottom of this week’s E-News you’ll find an email I received from Glenna Applewhite concerning the information about, and help needed for, the upcoming SWOT (Singing Women of Texas) Tour & Concert.  The concert is at Calvary Baptist Church on Sat. evening, June 24th.  However, they are arriving in Lubbock the preceding day – Fri., June 23rd – for a dinner/fellowship time here at BHBC.  Of course, all are invited to the Sat. evening concert, but the Friday event is where we need a great deal of help.  I will be out of town almost that entire week but, by reading Glenna’s letter, you can see that we have wonderfully capable people leading this effort.  Again, the email, containing everything you need to know, is at the bottom of this post.  Please “plug in” where you can.  I’ve provided the link to the SWOT Lone Star Tour here.


As of June 6th…

View of the new temporary wall surrounding the west stairwell (adjacent to the elevator)

What’s left of the stairwell…

View of the courtyard from the FLC



“I can tell you that in my six-year investigation of the resurrection of Jesus that resulted in my doctorate and in a more than 700-pages book, I tried to overturn every stone that I could, to a fault. And I came to the conclusion, after that study, that the evidence for Jesus’ physical resurrection from the dead was, by far, the best historical explanation of the known and indisputable historical data.” Dr. Mike Licona (I read this book when i took Dr. Licona’s class at HBU)  When I posted this on my Facebook page, a friend made the following observation:  I find it interesting that everyone who has ever tried to disprove the resurrection of Jesus has come to the same conclusion as Dr. Licona: C.S. Lewis, Lee Strobel, Josh McDowell, just to name a few.”



“I suggest to you that, of all the [spiritual] weapons at our disposal (cited in Ephesians 6:10-18), prayer is the most vital. It must be, for Satan tries everything he can to keep us from inviting God into the battle. Satan would like to keep it just between him and us.” Pastor/author, Chuck Smith

“Pray in the Spirit at all times and on every occasion. Stay alert and be persistent in your prayers…” (Eph. 6:18)



In the 6 1/2 minute video clip, hear the following respected scientists – all Christians – discuss the topic of science & faith: Francis Collins (NIH), Ian Hutchinson (MIT), Jonathan Feng (UC-Irvine), Ard Louis (Oxford), Rosalind Picard (MIT), Ken Miller (Brown), Troy Van Voorhis (MIT), Daniel Hasting (MIT), Praveen Sethupathy (UNC-Chapel Hill), Charmaine Royal (Duke)



Saw this 3-minute performance last week on America’s Got Talent.  A 12 year old boy absolutely blows away the audience with his extremely powerful and creative story-telling. Enjoy.



Many have asked how Kelsie is enjoying performing on the Showboat in Branson, MO.  She loves it.  Here are a few pics…



I once lived next to a guy who almost worshiped his lawn.  This guy here takes “commitment to lawn care” to an entirely different level.  Read the article here.


QUOTE(s) of the WEEK:

“The only exercise some people get is running people down and jumping to conclusions.”  Unknown

“Jesus cannot be just ‘liked’. His claims make us either kill him or crown him.” Timothy Keller




GRACE NOTES:  The Story of God

“This is not a fairy tale, but rather it is the Story all fairy tales are about,” writes author/speaker, Greg Koukl.  Read the blog here.


Soli Deo Gloria, Nick  (Email from Glenna regarding SWOT is below)


Here are the details concerning our SWOT Lone Star Tour:

The Singing Women of Texas consists of 8 groups from all over the state and 130 of us will be on tour across Texas from June 19 through June 25.  We will start in San Marcos and move to San Antonio.  We will sing 2 full concerts, minister at a nursing home, work in a shelter for the homeless, and sing at the Lockhart Women’s Prison.  Each night we will give a full concert at different sites.  We will travel to Lubbock on June 23 and have a catered meal in the Family Life Center here at Bacon Heights about 7:00 that evening.  (This is where you come in but I will get to that later.)  We will have a game night fellowship in the FLC.  Our mission day will be Saturday, the 24th and we will field 4 ministry groups.  In the morning and early afternoon 60+ of us will work at Lubbock Impact and Mission Lubbock painting, cleaning, sorting clothes, and prayer walking through each facility.  In the afternoon about 60 more of our group will travel to both Raider Ranch and Ventura Holiday House to give short concerts for the residents there.  At 7:00 p.m. the entire group will be in concert at Calvary Baptist Church to benefit Lubbock Impact.  Admission is free and a love offering will be taken for Lubbock Impact with 100% going to them.  I am the hostess for this leg of the journey and am assisted by Lisa Gentry of SWOT-West Texas, Glynna Penney of SWOT-West Central and West’s new director, Lela Harris of SWOT-Panhandle.

Here is how you can “Be the Church” in support of this mission effort to the folks in Lubbock.

1. Pray for this mission.  We will be traveling a long way so pray for traveling grace.  We will need our health and our voices to do the work we intend to do.  We will need each place we serve to be bathed in prayer.

2.  The fellowship needs include bottled water and canned drinks.  Joyce Rowe ( Joyce will need to get the key, Mike) has offered to be sure that we are set and ready to go on that day, but she cannot do all of it.  Some of you will surely be needed at whatever time Joyce is ready that day to set up.  This would be those of you who have said previously that you would help. (See list below of those signed up)  We will let you know.  We will arrive about 6:30 into Lubbock after traveling from San Antonio.  Our meal is catered about 7:30 and included in the price of our trip so you would not have to set up that the caterer will, but dessert set-up for the evening and fellowship time needs those drinks to be ready.  I have ordered cake for 200 and I have included all you helpers in dessert and drinks during the fellowship just not the meal.  My cake lady will also be arriving from Midland to set up the cake.

3.  We are having a game night so we need a game theme on every table.  Such as in the middle of one table the game could be Jokers and Marbles and another might be dominoes or Spinner or Chicken Foot.  If the adult choir members could help with this set-up by getting together games and putting them out that would be great.  One or two tables might have adult coloring books and colored pencils.

4.  We need a set up of tables and chairs to seat 140-200 for SWOT and however many we think will be there from BHBC Adult Choir and/or Sunday School Class.  Plus we need serving tables set for caterer and for dessert/drinks for the fellowship.

5.  We also need some folks at the FLC to greet the ladies as they arrive.  With our construction this is even more important.  We need someone outside to show buses where to park, we need folks to assist ladies off the buses, we need door monitors at the east entrance.  We need to be sure that everyone knows where the restrooms are located.

6.  We will provide a little entertainment in the form of a 3-5 piece preview concert for you who come to help.

7.  We will need a clean up crew too.  If everyone there from BHBC pitches in it can be done quickly.

List of volunteers I already have for helping Joyce:

Jan Johnson

Dianne Murphy

Eddie Ruth Andrews

Kay Newberry

Sue Cowan

Coretta Kerr (Can help with early set up but cannot be there that night, I think)

Sharon Barber

Dorothy Hargrove

Pat Douglas

Tag Cloud